Well done Richard Mycroft, age 16 from Melbourn Village College, Cambridgeshire and Selvan Gnanakumaran and Tony Cardell for your solutions.
We assume here that a and b are integers and a 2+b 2 is divisible by 3.
Here is Richard's which uses modulus arithmetic.
Any number is either -1, 0, or 1 mod 3. For any number n we have
Therefore n 2 = 0 mod 3 if n = 0 mod 3, or n 2= 1 mod 3 if n = 1 or -1 mod 3.
If a 2 + b 2 is divisible by 3 then a
2 + b 2 = 0 mod 3. Now, N mod 3 + M mod 3 =N
+M mod 3. Therefore if both a and b are not divisible by 3 then
If one of a and b is not divisible by 3 (but the other is) then:
In both cases a 2 + b 2 is not divisible by 3. So if a 2 + b 2 is divisible by 3 then both a and b are divisible by 3.
Here is Tony's proof which is of course equivalent. Any number n falls into one of three categories, having a remainder of 0, 1 or 2 when divided by 3. Therefore any number n 2 will have a remainder 0 2 = 0, 1 2 = 1, or 2 2 = 4, also giving a remainder 1 when divided by 3. For a 2+b 2 to be divisible by 3, it must be congruent to 0 mod 3. The only way for this to happen, since a 2 and b 2 can only be zero or one mod 3 and so their maximum sum is two, is for them both to be zero mod 3. If a 2 and b 2 are both zero mod 3, they are both divisible by three, and thus both a and b are divisible by three.
Selvan proved this result in a different way: First say that if a 2 +b 2 is a multiple of 3 then a 2 + b 2 = 3n , where n is a positive integer.
Now if b is not a multiple of 3, b can be expressed in the form 3x \pm 1, where x is an integer. Therefore so and therefore a 2 is not a multiple of three as it is expressed as a multiple of three minus 1. Hence a is not a multiple of 3, and therefore a can be expressed in the form where y is a positive integer.
Therefore and so
The right hand side of the expression is a multiple of three, but the left hand side however is clearly not, as it is a multiple of three add 2. Here is a contradiction.
When b was said to be a non multiple of three, it led to saying that a must also be a non multiple, and a contradiction occurred. Therefore neither a nor b can be non multiples of three, hence if a 2 + b 2 is a multiple of three then a and b are both multiples of three.