There was a correct solution from Andrei Lazanu (School 205, Bucharest). The first part is very clear but I have tried to simplify his solution to the second part for inclusion here. Perhaps someone could improve on this for us. Thank you for your hard work Andrei.

First, I approximated 3 using the method given in the problem. I know that 3 is between 1 and 2 because 12 <(3)2 < 22 or 1<3<4.

I know that the approximation of 3 correct to five decimal places is:
31.73205

Now I show each of the approximation steps:

First approximation:


32

Second approximation:


3 3 2 +2 2 =1.75

Third approximation:


3 3 1.75 +1.75 2 =1.732142857

Fourth approximation:


3 3 1.732142857 +1.732142857 2 =1.73205081

So, four approximations are sufficient to approximate 3 correct to 5 decimal places.

You could think of the above as


a2 a2 n +n 2 =m

Where n is the approximation to the root of a 2 (that is "a") and m the next approximation.

The first approximation (n) differs from a by k. I can therefore write n as a + k where k is numerically less than a (k could be negative).

So I have


The next approximation = a2 a+k +a+k 2

But


a2 a+k +a+k 2 = 2 a2 +2ak+ k2 2(a+k)

and


2 a2 +2ak+ k2 2(a+k) = 2a(a+k)+ k2 2(a+k) = 2a(a+k) 2(a+k) + k2 2(a+k) =a+ k2 2(a+k)

While a is positive,


k2 2(a+k)

must be positive as k is numerically less than a.

So


a< a2 a+k +a+k 2

But the same equation could be written as:


2 a2 +2ak+ k2 2(a+k) = a2 +(a+k)2 2(a+k) = (a+k)2 2(a+k) + a2 2(a+k) = a+k 2 + a2 2(a+k)

The following number is equal to a+k :


a+k 2 + a2 2(a+k) + 2ak+ k2 2(a+k) = (a+k)2 + a2 +2ak+ k2 2(a+k) = a2 + k2 +2ak+ a2 +2ak+ k2 2(a+k) = 2( a2 +2ak+ k2 ) 2(a+k) = (a+k)2 (a+k) =(a+k)

This means that


a2 a+k +a+k 2 <a+k.

From the two inequalities I obtain that:


a< a2 a+k +a+k 2 <a+k.

This means that the solution obtained goes closer and closer at each step to the real value of whether k is positive or negative.