Well done Robert Goudie of Madras College, St Andrew's, Scotland
and Andrei Lazanu of School No. 205, Bucharest, Romania for your
solutions to this problem.
In both parts of this question we consider the limiting case of a process which is repeated infinitely
often and things are not what they might seem to be.
(a) In a square
with sides of length 1 unit a path is drawn from
to the opposite corner
so
that all the steps in the path are either parallel to
or parallel to
and not necessarily equal
steps. If we draw paths of this sort putting in more and more and more steps the length of the path is
always the same.
"
The steps parallel to
together must stretch all the way across from
to
and the steps
parallel to
together must stretch all the way up from
to
. Irrespective of the number of
small steps, A point moving on any path of this type moves a total of 1 unit parallel to
and a
total of one unit parallel to
, hence a total of 2 units altogether. With more and more steps the
path gets closer and closer to the diagonal so you might expect the length to converge to
.
Surprisingly the length is always 2 units and not even close to
units.
(b) Now consider the graphs of
for
and
. As
tends to infinity the graphs oscillate more and more and get closer and closer to the
axis. We have to prove
that the length of the curve from
to
is the same for all values of
. The hint says we don't
need to calculate the length of the path here and we should think about scale factors.
The graph of
from
to
is similar to the
graph of
from
to
but scaled down by a linear scale
factor of 1/2 so
is half the length of
. However
is repeated twice periodically between
and
so the two pieces together have the same length as
.
This shows that all these graphs on
have the same length although as
the graphs get closer and closer to the
axis so you might suppose that the length converges to
.
Surprisingly the length is always the same and much more than
.